Archive for the 'Charlaine Harris' Category


Best Quote from the True Blood Panel at 2013 Comic Con

BS Ifrit

“We’re going to try to condense the number of stories we’re telling and make this really feel like we’re coming home,” [Brian] Buckner said to great applause. “I wanna bring it in a little bit. Not to discount Charlaine [Harris]‘ books at all, but my hope is to get all these people we love living under this one story and one threat. Really just make it about this small town we’ve all come to know and love.”

Well, that’s rich. The huge mess, the billion storylines, the dirty white trash werewolves, the ENDLESS maenad orgies, the feminine hygiene commercial faeries, the wasted season of The Authority, the continuous propping up of Bill Compton as the Hero of the show, the SHEARING OF ERIC NORTHMAN’s HAIR (no I’ll never get off that soapbox), and the Ifrit, that was Charlaine Harris’ fault was it?

Boy, not only do they feel like they can get away retconning their own mythology and storylines to fit wherever the hell they decide to go each season, they’re now retconning what their showrunner has said year after year (paraphrasing) “If we followed the books’ storylines, book readers would be bored.”  I see, I’ve been mistaken, what I have been watching is a faithful adaptation of  Charlaine Harris’ “The Southern Vampire Mysteries.”  Close, just like “Game of Thrones” to GRRM’s books.  Those books I read before the series started must have been an alternate universe vampire book series.

I will give them that they seem to be focusing more on the important characters this season, and Eric’s storyline has been fantastic so far, but we are on the downward side of the season and usually around episode 8 (because this season is shorter we’ll have to place the episode at 6 or 7) it all starts falling apart, not coming together.


I may no longer be a Harris fan because of the way she wrote the coming together of  Sam and Sookie in her  last “Southern Vampire Book,” but I will defend her against any comments that she is to blame for the clusterf*%$k that is True  Blood.


An Artist has a “Right” to create exactly what they want, but is that always wise?

My first instinct, as an artist, was to absolutely defend Charlaine Harris’ right as an artist to write her story any way she saw fit.  It’s still her right.

However, in light of Ms. Harris calling the people upset with the spoilers for her new book “Dead Ever After” “irrational” on her website, I had a rethink about it and I’m not so sure her indignant “right” is actually wise.

As an artist, I have a right to paint whatever subject moves me, in whatever style, using whatever colors I choose.   If I have a show, people partake of my paintings without any monetary output.  If my paintings aren’t their cup of tea, they walk away but if my paintings resonate, they buy them.   If my work turns people off or repels them, I don’t make money and have an apartment full of paintings that only I enjoy.  So, if I want to share my work, I need to make it accessible, even if it’s not totally my cup of tea.

If I want to do a painting for myself that’s fine, but I can’t expect people who have liked something I’ve done in the past to like this particular painting I’ve done solely as I pleased if it’s wildly different.

I have done paintings on commission.  If, for example, I had three paintings of ballet dancers in pink and someone bought them and paid me to do a fourth for them to make it a series, and I decided I was tired of painting ballet dancers and painted a break dancer in blues and reds, I can’t be indignant because they were expecting the painting to go along with the three they already bought.  I can’t be surprised that they are angry because they paid for something I didn’t deliver.

So, although I believe, yes, she has a right to write whatever she wants, since she’s writing a series that millions of people have read, if she wants people to partake of her art, she does have to take her audience into consideration.  Consideration is the key word.

I believe a character poll was done of Harris’ fans and their favorite characters.   I know she knew how popular certain characters were.

I also know Charlaine is not a stupid women.  She had to know there would be great disappointment in what she wrote.   But I don’t think she understands where the disappointment lies.  She thinks people are being this vociferous because of the suitor Sookie ends up with.  That’s not the case for the most part, though I can’t speak for everyone.

From what I’ve been reading, it’s not Sookie’s HEA people are furious about.  They are angry because there was no build up to the eventual HEA.  Yes, hints were dropped here and there throughout the books but there was no emotional build up for the readers, or the characters for that matter.  After enjoying a series of books for 13 years, some readers feel betrayed by what they thought they were reading.

It’s also about the destruction or the closing off of a favorite character, one that Charlaine wrote appealingly, whether she was aware of it or not.  I know she always expressed puzzlement for this character’s popularity but it has grown exponentially, so maybe Charlaine should have tried to understand this popularity instead of dismissing it as readers who just didn’t understand what she was writing.

It’s not a handful of readers who are fans of this character; it’s a large swath of readers, internationally as well, and who have nothing to do with one another.  No one reader, or group of readers, was influencing all the others.   This character is the most popular character on True Blood as well.  No matter how hard other characters have been pushed in the series, THIS character remains the most popular.  Must be something to that mustn’t there?

As an artist, Ms. Harris should have been flattered instead of vexed (she has expressed her vexation and the moderators on her website reflected this) and she should have tried to figure out why this character was so popular.

So back to does Charlain Harris have a right to wrap up her book the way she see’s fit.? Yes, she does.  Giving Sookie the HEA she decided on in the second book is fine.  BUT she should have had some consideration for the legions of fans who were invested in another character and placed that character in, if not a good place, a neutral place. After all, even though the books were about Sookie, there was one singular character that was featured more than most, that was more fleshed out than most, more fleshed out even than Sookie’s eventual HEA.    By not taking all her fans into consideration, she is experiencing a backlash and I don’t think she should be surprised about that.

Dead Ever After, the last of the Southern Vampire Mysteries

Dead Ever After, the last of the Southern Vampire Mysteries

I will be back after Tuesday, when I will have read Dead Ever After, to give my thoughts about the book

February 2018
« Oct    

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 24 other followers